The Woz Prefers Windows Phone Over iOS & Android

Yes, that Woz. He says he prefers Windows Phone over anything else. That’s pretty amazing, and definitely a nod towards Microsoft’s efforts. He finds Android navigation cumbersome and iOS interactions are more awkward. Click the link the title for full the story.

I have to say, kudos to him for being a honest critique. But on my end, I guess I’m just used to Android navigation so much that it seems natural to me. When I’m on iOS, I’m always lost and have no clue what to do. I’m constantly looking for a back button – especially when one app knocks me to another and there’s no way to come back. Really frustrating experience.

That being said, Windows Phone definitely has a great UI and is really, really easy to use. Both my parents own Windows Phones and they caught onto the whole thing incredibly quick. On the flipside, my dad has an Android tablet (Acer Iconia A100) and it took a week of questions for him to finally get comfortable. My mom used to have an iPod touch and I think she still hasn’t figured out how to use the darn thing. I don’t know what it is, but she never got the hang of it. Until she stopped using it, there would be questions nearly on a daily basis.

Of course, these are just my observances. The case for iOS, Android, and/or Windows Phone will greatly differ depending on the user’s background in technology. Both my parents are more tech-savvy than most others, so I guess that may be a reason for their situation.

With Ice Cream Sandwich, it seems that things have improved greatly. The Android interface is not only a lot more beautiful, but also a bit more intuitive. However, the amount of power Google has shoved into Android still makes it a lot more complicated than any other OS, and that’s just a consequence of the robustness of the OS. As Matias and the team focus more on design, I think we’re going to see things get a lot more simpler for the average user, but even at the state of Android right now, there’s a lot for regular users to grasp right away.

Here’s one thing that stuck out to me, though:

He’s so impressed by it, in fact, that he defines the experience of using a Windows Phone as feeling like you’re “with a friend not a tool.

But here’s the thing – I need my phone to be a tool, not just a friend. I need to do things on my phone and get out. Sure, it takes some setting up, but once that’s done I’m in and out of my phone in seconds to check 3 different inboxes, 3 social networks, a calendar, and the latest headlines. There’s no opening apps, just switching between three screens.

Yes, Windows Phone is simple, but simple doesn’t always get the job done. For me – Android just does. Windows Phone and iOS simply don’t have what it takes for me to switch over. It’s not about Google-integration or anything – it’s just how it works is how I need my devices to do things for me. I can go on for hours about why, but the other platforms just don’t cut it, and they’re far from getting there as well.

Father of Linux Named Technology Laureate

Well deserved!

Apple SVP Drops Instagram

Apparently he didn’t like the Android wave. Can someone tell him he doesn’t have to follow the people he doesn’t like? Maybe he forgot about that simple point. Regardless, I gave some thoughts on Google+ about this:

Google+ opens it’s doors – photographers (as in talented artists) are incredibly happy and end up publishing a book with the community’s photos. Instragram opens it’s doors – “photographers” (note the quotes) begin an outcry about losing exclusivity. Just saying.

I may not be a photographer, but I’m so glad I’m in this community. I’ve met amazing people, learned things I could never imagine, and am meeting more new and interesting people on a daily basis. Keep up the great work, Google+ers. This is what the social web is all about.

Get off your high horse, Instagrammers. You’re not better than everyone else.

The Innovator’s Patent

Today, Twitter introduced a patent assignment format called the Innovator’s Patent Agreement. This is the gist of what it means:

The IPA is a new way to do patent assignment that keeps control in the hands of engineers and designers. It is a commitment from Twitter to our employees that patents can only be used for defensive purposes. We will not use the patents from employees’ inventions in offensive litigation without their permission. What’s more, this control flows with the patents, so if we sold them to others, they could only use them as the inventor intended.

Amazing. This is what technology patents should be. It’s incredible that this is now just happening. Kudos to Twitter for starting this movement. Tech industry: take note. If you really care about technology, the next generation of technologists, and users – this is what you should be using for your patents. Don’t use your IP for offence and gains; that’s what your engineering talent is for.

Imagine if Apple did this

John Gruber on the Asus Transformer GPS “dongle” fiasco:

File Under ‘Imagine if Apple Did This’: “Free Dongle!”, they proclaim, like it’s a good thing.

Yeah, just imagine. Just imagine if Apple messed up a product – let’s say the iPhone. Just for kicks, let’s imagine that it’s the antenna.

What if the then-CEO first insulted a user’s intelligence for claiming the antenna was not working as intended. Imagine, then, that instead of admitting their faults, they said that there’s nothing wrong with it. On top of that, imagine if they gave away a free case to anyone with the faulty (oops, not faulty) iPhone because it remedies this problem (oops, there is no problem); kind of like Asus is doing with this dongle. Just imagine.

At least Asus is willing to accept a mistake. And moreover, on a feature majority of users don’t even use. I haven’t used my tablet for navigation – ever. That’s what my phone is for. Apple screwed up the most important part of a phone – the phone part. And then they had the audacity to blame the users and point fingers at the rest of the industry.

Yeah, John. Just imagine.

Losing the Web

Sergey Brin, Google’s co-founder and engineering mastermind, made an interesting point in an interview with the Guardian. Maybe you’ve read it already, but just to reiterate the point I want to discuss:

[Brin] warned that the rise of Facebook and Apple, which have their own proprietary platforms and control access to their users, risked stifling innovation and balkanising the web.

“There’s a lot to be lost,” he said. “For example, all the information in apps – that data is not crawlable by web crawlers. You can’t search it.”

Brin takes hard shots at his biggest rivals in the industry right now. Apple and Facebook are clear threats to what Google wants accomplish, whether it’s world domination, serving ads, or simply indexing the web.

There’s a sad outburst that occurred after this interview. People immediately fled to the point I just made – Brin was probably serving his own company in those statements. But, regardless of Brin’s reasoning, there’s something that’s glaring at us right now. I’m not here to say the perpetrators of a closed, non-searchable web are any or all of Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, Twitter, and the like. I’m posting this for another reason.

I’m posting this because he’s right.

Imagine if Wikipedia launched as an app. Even worse, what if it launched as an app on one platform. Not only would we not be able to find the contents of it anywhere except for this particular app, only a certain fraction of privileged users would be able to access it. Take that, all the social content, all the sharing, all the information that we’ve been able to index on numerous search engines, and think about all the information that could be lost.

Brin may have been selfish in his statement – I’m not going to agree or disagree with that, because that’s not the point. The point is that we, as users of the web, are losing the resources we were once selflessly served freely. And that’s a problem we’re going to need to solve. Fast.

Nilay Patel digs into DOJ’s Apple ebook price-fixing case

Amazing analysis as always by Nilay. However one part of the whole breakdown really sticks out; here’s what Apple said to publishers to solve the “Amazon problem” (or rather, Amazon putting up fair prices for digital content):

you set the price, and we get our 30 percent, and yes, the customer pays a little more, but that’s what you want anyway.

Tell me again how Apple became amazingly profitable because they put customers first. I love that one.

More on False Fragmentation

After my Fragmentation is a Bad Excuse post swam to the top of /r/Android, I’m finding others discussing the false claims of fragmentation across the web. One of the best one’s I’ve found is this one. Steven goes deep into the technical details on how to avoid fragmentation without getting to technical about it – something I tried and failed to do in my last post. I actually got rid of two paragraphs that discussed how to avoid it because I wanted it to be more geared towards the non-developer. The best part is that it’s by a developer, and not someone who doesn’t understand what they’re talking about. Fragmentation is a term thrown around by people who don’t even understand it, and that’s incredibly dangerous. Steven does a great job of clearing these wrong notions – definitely worth a read.



Copyright © Tech Thirst
by anuj ahooja

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site