Category Replies

I Recommend Nexus

Apparently Dan Graziano is an Android fanboy who’d never recommend an Android phone to his friends or family. He writes:

 A new Android device is released almost every month from major manufacturers, often leaving consumers with severe cases of buyer’s remorse. [...] Rather than marketing devices and services with competitive pricing, these companies fill handsets with unnecessary bloatware and custom user interface skins. [...] Switching between a Motorola device and an HTC device will give the consumer a completely different experience. Android itself has no consistent flow

Agreed. Agreed. And agreed. Dan makes no mistakes here – the OEMs and carriers suck, period. They make no effort to please customers, they’ll do anything to top the competition, and the worst is that they do it regardless of how terrible the rest of the device may be. They don’t make a coherent interface, they make life frustrating with updates, and what’s more is that they have no clue how to test their devices properly. When Motorola releases 10 phones in 2 months and Samsung and HTC do the same, it can be quite the frustrating experience. No doubt.

And yet, there’s a simple solution. One that let’s you have a much more powerful operating system than iOS. One that has features way before the competition and still get an amazing experience. It’s called the Nexus line. Whenever anyone asks what phone they should buy, I point directly to a vanilla device created by Google. I’ve owned two Nexus phones and have recommend them to others and so far they’ve all had great experiences. You want to make these stupid OEMs and carriers to shape up with Android? Show them that Google’s got it done right and hopefully they’ll follow along just as Google hoped they would. Nexus devices encapsulate exactly what an Android device should be – powerful, clean, intuitive, and as far away from carriers as possible (unless you’re on Verizon…in that case, get the hell out of there).

I’ve come to a really harsh conclusion lately – OEMs and carriers are doing a horrible job with a tool they could have used to change the way we use our mobile devices. The Android Open Source could easily be one of the most important parts of mobile technology today but it’s being nothing but abused by third parties. But there are some bright spots. Asus is a great example of a company doing Android right – multiple, continuously supported devices that each have their own niche market. Whether it’s the Transformer line, the MeMo, or the brand new PadFone line – they’re pushing the bar while maintaining an awesome experience. That’s what Android needs to be about, and all these other OEMs need to learn from them and Google how to do technology the right way.

So, Dan – don’t recommend the iPhone to your friends and family. You’re making them hang on to a device with sub-par capabilities.

I recommend Nexus.

Why I’m An Android Developer

Orlando Green of Android Activist:

I’m sure that some developers get in to Android because of its open nature and the pure volume of phones that are out there. They have a very large earning potential, but they also have to deal with fragmentation, dumb commenters in the market, and a company that likes to release early and iterate often. Are most developers used to this type of model, or do they burnout after a few months of trying to reach all products with all of their fragmentations?

Definitely an interesting question. But to answer this question, I always like to look back to what attracted me to Android as both a user and a developer.

A little less than three years back, I bought my first smartphone – the iPhone 3GS. I loved it. I thought it was the best thing I could ever use as a phone. I downloaded app after app amazed at the potential of this device. Fast-forward six months later – I was bored. Bored of icons. Bored of an inflexible operating system. Bored of opening apps, closing apps, and opening more apps. I wanted more.

I bought the Nexus One. I then realized that this device had more potential. Not just boxes that you open and close – widgets, extensions, plugins, replacements. And the best part? I didn’t even need to jailbreak or root to do any of it. This was using the operating system I got out of the box. The potential was, needless to say, unbelievable.

There was so much to do and, in turn, my developer brain switched on – there was so much I could make. I could create integrated software and all the user would have to do is tap a button. That’s it! It’s something I could never do with iOS. And it wasn’t because it was an open source operating system – it was because it was designed for flexibility and extensiblity from the start.

So to answer your question: I started developing Android exactly for the reason you think we might get frustrated – the constant improvement, increase in possibility, and iterations that just keep adding more and more to the large bucket of possible applications, extensions, and so on. What’s even more exciting is the fact that it’s coming to so many different form factors – phones, TVs, tablets, computers, car dashes, and the list goes on. More birds, one stone.

It might be a challenge, but it keeps my mind turning with new ideas and innovations. And I love it.

This definitely isn’t the only reason I develop for Android, but it’s definitely somewhere around the top ones.

Vanilla Android On All The Things!

Mike Swanson of AndroidActivist:

Why doesn’t Google and Android require that an AOSP build be available with the phone – as an alternative? Straight up, unadulterated, vanilla-as-it-gets Android, for every phone, no matter how expensive, no matter what the version. I realize that the Nexus line is the “true Android experience”… but what’s stopping Google from giving everyone with and Android phone that same experience? Perhaps it would start to solve the fragmentation issue once and for all.

First off, I couldn’t agree more. In fact, I wish this could happen. But it won’t, and I’ll give you three good reasons for it.

  1. What OEMs put on top of their Android phones isn’t just a skin. In fact, it’s not even “on top”. It’s on top, on the side, inside, around the corner, and in places we’re afraid to speak of. Hence the late updates – you can’t delta something that you’ve changed so much.
  2. The fact is that putting AOSP next to their “ROM” is literally impossible and counterproductive to their goals. They don’t want users buying Android phones. That’s the last thing they want. Why? Because then there’s no brand loyalty. It won’t make you stop and think twice about buying an Android phone from another company. Samsung, HTC, Motorola – they want you to buy their phones. Not Android. Google wants you to buy Android, don’t mix that up.
  3. Google forcing OEMs to put AOSP on their phones will kill the ecosystem. Look, I hate late updates, lag, and lack of support as much as the next guy, but Android was never meant to be AOSP. It was meant to be what OEMs wanted it to be, and therefore Google has succeeded. Believe it or not, this is exactly what Google wanted – choice on every level, be it hardware, software, application, extensions, or ecosystem. Freedom.

You aren’t the first to suggest this, Mike, and you definitely won’t be the last. Don’t think of it as your voice unheard; think of it as the ecosystem taking the path it was meant to take. Me? I’ll stick to the Nexus phones because I know I want clean, vanilla Android coming straight from Google.

Smartphones > PCs? Not so fast

For the first time, smartphones have become more popular than traditional computers.

There are two big problems with this statement based on the study. For one, we’re talking about shipped smartphones, not bought. So, sure, smartphones are getting more popular on the OEM side, but it says nothing about the consumer. Then again, I don’t doubt that more smartphones have been sold either.

But that means nothing. Why? Well, think about it this way – majority, if not all, of the people I know own a PC, but many don’t own a smartphone. In fact, most people that do have a smartphone bought it in 2011. Does that mean that they’ve decided that the smartphone is more important? Of course not. They bought a smartphone because they already had a PC and based on the influx of all of these power house mobile devices, they wanted to buy one. Eventually things will even out again; if they don’t, then that’s an interesting change.

 

What Google shouldn’t do

It’s time for Google to try something radically different: Close Android. License it—you know, sell it in exchange for money!—to phone makers. [...] The bigger opportunity is for Google to use Motorola to create an iPhone of its own—a phone that everyone wants, that offers premium features at a reasonable price, and that can be sold at a steep profit. [...] In the phone business, the real money is in Apple’s model, in building and selling your own phones. Copy it.

I honestly can’t tell if this was a joke or not. I thought PandoDaily was supposed to have intelligent writers. First off – license Android? Seriously? Does Farhad know open source technology at all? Or is he just like his blogging buddy MG Siegler and is completely clueless about it? And secondly, create their own iPhone? As in a device that Google controls? I wonder if he’s ever heard of the Nexus series.

Android doesn’t need saving. In fact, last I heard it was doing quite fine as an open source operating system; better than iOS, Windows Mobile & Phone, and BBOS. On top of that, while Apple continues to make a closed, tyrannical ecosystem that only allows innovation as long as they accept it, Google is creating software that allows innovation on every single level – hardware, OS, applications, extensions, and so on. Clearly Farhad misses the point and thinks that there’s only one way to do something right, and that’s Apple’s way. Wrong again.

Funny thing is that while Apple may have amazing numbers, they’ve begun a rough track of starting to copy Android, webOS, and Windows Phone. You can watch the last WWDC keynote and the last Google I/O Android keynote and see that one company is still innovating a hell of a lot more than the other. And it’s been said again and again by recognized, unbiased bloggers that the Galaxy Nexus – the Google phone – is better than the iPhone 4S.

Sorry, Farhad, but Google doesn’t need your help to “save” Android. I think they’re doing just fine.

“Managing” vs “Using”

Interesting review of the Samsung Galaxy S2 by Charlie Kindel of Microsoft. I like reading opinions from people who understand another operating system really well because it makes you think about what can be improved in the OS you know and love. After reading the review there’s is one part I want to discuss:

People who enjoy “managing” their phone might enjoy “managing” their Android smartphone. Those folks will probably forget how much fun “managing” a smartphone was after they’ve used Windows Phone for a while. Instead they’ll see how much fun it is to “use” a smartphone.

“Managing” my phone, you say? On the contrary, I “use” my phone plenty, but the reason I can’t switch out of Android isn’t because I enjoy “managing” my phone. There’s a big mistake he’s making here. He’s assuming that I, as an Android user, “manage” my phone simply because I enjoy messing around with it. Now although there might be truth with the fact that I enjoy it, there’s actually a much bigger reason: productivity.

I can organize my device with widgets, icons, folders, extensions, plugins and all to make my life simpler. Like I said in this Google+ post, widgets make my morning update a 5-swipe incident. Within these 5 swipes, I get a gist of what the rest of my morning is going to look like. And how did I “manage” to do that? I got a few apps, stuck widgets in places that I felt made my life easier, and got on with it. I also have a few extensions that make my life easier, but I don’t want to get too deep into this. I just want to say this - ”managing” my phone doesn’t mean I don’t “use” it. It means I use it to my liking. And my liking isn’t a sea of icons or a list of tiles. It’s seeing my calendar, email inboxes, and news at a glance straight out of unlock.

He made quite a few other points that I disagree with, but honestly – most of it is just opinion. This particular shot at the user base was all I really felt like pointing out. I think it’s more about getting very used to a particular OS and seeing something drastically different in nature.

P.S. Does the Galaxy S2 seriously ship with a task manager? Sorry, but that’s so Eclair.

The Other, Other Side Of Open

Another day, another Apple columnist (or Apple apologist, rather) talking about Android and “open” and completely missing the point. It’s laughable at first just to think about someone who clearly misunderstands the concept of open source to critique it. Yet, once again, TechCrunch – one of the most important blogs in technology, mind you – chooses to find the worst person for the job. I’ve talked about Android and it’s open nature quite a bit on this blog – in fact, maybe a bit too much. Today I’m about to ride that train for the third time. MG Seigler, Apple columnist over at TechCrunch decided to talk about Android once again. Yes, an Apple columnist wrote a whole article on Android and it’s negative affects on both Google and the rest of the tech world. It had a few very misleading points that I wanted to go over. Read more

Missing the Point: Android, Linux, and a Standard Ecosystem

I find that a lot of people still miss the point about what Android as an open source project is. I’ve talked about it in the past, but it seems that there’s some holes that I still haven’t explained. I was reading an article that talked about Android being the “new Linux” and why it’s a bad thing (I suggest reading this article first) and I had a hard time agreeing with majority of what was being argued. The author of this article seems to not really understand the major differences. He starts by making a connection between the fall of desktop Linux and Android and then goes on to talk about Amazon. But in all honesty, I think he misses the point. The game is very different with Android, and there are some very key factors that will make it’s destiny different than Linux and make it a strong standard. Time to break this down. Read more



Copyright © Tech Thirst
by anuj ahooja

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress

Switch to our mobile site